Reclaiming America’s Industrial Might: The Southwest’s Untapped Potential

The United States didn’t become an economic juggernaut by accident. Our rise to industrial dominance was the result of deliberate policies, hard work, and a commitment to innovation. The story of America’s industrial ascendancy is one of visionaries, inventors, and entrepreneurs who laid the foundation for what would become the world’s largest economy.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, America was home to a new breed of industrial titans—men like Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, and John D. Rockefeller—who built empires that not only revolutionized their respective industries but also transformed the nation. Andrew Carnegie’s steel empire didn’t just provide the material for America’s burgeoning infrastructure; it built the very skeleton upon which modern America was constructed. Skyscrapers, bridges, railroads—these were all made possible by the steel that flowed from Carnegie’s mills.

Meanwhile, Henry Ford was revolutionizing the automotive industry. The Model T wasn’t just a car; it was a symbol of American innovation and efficiency. Ford’s assembly line didn’t just lower the cost of production; it democratized mobility. The automobile, once a luxury for the wealthy, became accessible to the average American, fundamentally altering the nation’s landscape and economy.

John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, on the other hand, was the fuel behind America’s industrial engine. Rockefeller’s dominance of the oil industry provided the energy that powered factories, transported goods, and heated homes. His business practices, while often criticized, set the stage for the modern corporate structure and the integration of industries on a national scale.

These men, along with others like Thomas Edison, whose inventions brought electricity into American homes, and Alexander Graham Bell, whose telephone revolutionized communication, created an environment where innovation thrived and industry flourished. The United States, with its vast natural resources, a growing population, and a spirit of entrepreneurship, was uniquely positioned to dominate the industrial age.

But the real test of American industrial might came during World War II. The United States didn’t just enter the war; it became the “Arsenal of Democracy.” American factories produced the tanks, planes, ships, and munitions that were critical to the Allied victory. Companies like Boeing, General Motors, and DuPont shifted their production lines from consumer goods to war materials, demonstrating the flexibility and power of American industry.

The post-war period, known as the “Golden Age of Capitalism,” saw the United States emerge as the leader of the free world. American manufacturing was the backbone of the global economy. We built everything from automobiles to airplanes, from consumer goods to military hardware. The GI Bill fueled consumer demand, providing education and home loans to returning soldiers, while the Marshall Plan helped rebuild Europe with American-made goods.

During this time, our manufacturing sector didn’t just create jobs—it created wealth. Workers earned good wages, bought homes, sent their kids to college, and enjoyed a standard of living that was the envy of the world. This wasn’t just an economic success—it was a social success. The middle class thrived, and with it, the American Dream.

But by the 1970s, cracks began to appear in this industrial foundation. The oil shocks, rising inflation, and the emergence of global competition started to erode America’s manufacturing dominance. The United States, once the workshop of the world, began to lose its edge. Japan and Germany, rebuilt with American aid, became formidable competitors. American companies, facing higher labor costs and increased regulation, found it more profitable to move production overseas.

The advent of free trade agreements like NAFTA in the 1990s accelerated this decline. Companies found it cheaper to outsource production to countries with lower labor costs and fewer regulations. The result was a hollowing out of the American industrial base, particularly in the Midwest, which became known as the Rust Belt. Cities like Detroit, once the heart of the automotive industry, fell into decline as factories closed and jobs disappeared.

This shift wasn’t just economic; it was cultural. The loss of manufacturing jobs led to the erosion of the middle class, the backbone of American society. The sense of pride that came from building something with your hands, from contributing to the nation’s prosperity, was lost. The American Dream, once attainable through hard work and determination, became increasingly out of reach for many.

Peter Schiff, in his book How an Economy Grows and How It Crashes , provides a stark analysis of the economic principles that underlie this decline. Schiff argues that real economic growth comes from production—not consumption. For decades, America’s economic policies have been focused on stimulating demand, often through debt-fueled consumption, rather than on building the capacity to produce. This short-sighted approach led to a situation where we were consuming more than we were producing, borrowing from the future to fund the present.

Schiff’s analogy of the “island economy” is particularly telling. Imagine an island with a small population that produces all the goods it needs. As long as the islanders are productive, the economy thrives. But if they begin to consume more than they produce, relying on imports or borrowing, the economy begins to deteriorate. Eventually, they run out of goods, and the economy collapses.

This is the situation the United States finds itself in today. We have become dangerously dependent on foreign production. We consume goods made in China, Japan, and Germany, while our own factories sit idle or have been repurposed for other uses. This dependence isn’t just an economic issue; it’s a national security concern. If a crisis disrupts global supply chains, the United States could find itself unable to produce the goods it needs to survive.

But there’s another way—a way to rebuild our industrial base, restore our economic independence, and create real, sustainable growth. And that way leads us to the Southwest.

The American Southwest is a region of unparalleled potential. Its vast, open spaces are a blank canvas upon which we can paint the future of American industry. Unlike the crowded, overregulated cities of the coasts, the Southwest offers the space and freedom to build big, think big, and create big. Here, we can develop a new industrial base that is secure, self-sufficient, and technologically advanced.

The Southwest’s potential isn’t just about space—it’s about strategy. The region offers a unique combination of natural resources, geographic advantages, and an influx of labor from across the border. Yes, the controversial issue of immigration plays a role here. The reality is that millions of migrants, many of whom are eager to work, are crossing our southern border. Instead of viewing this as a problem, why not see it as an opportunity?

Imagine vast manufacturing complexes rising from the desert, powered by the latest technology and staffed by a willing workforce. These facilities would not only revitalize American manufacturing but also address the issue of border security by providing jobs and stability in a region that desperately needs both.

Consider the economic potential of the Southwest’s vast land. The region is home to some of the largest stretches of undeveloped land in the country. States like Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas offer millions of acres of land that could be transformed into industrial hubs. The geographic location is ideal for trade, with proximity to major markets in the United States, Mexico, and beyond.

The influx of labor is another critical factor. The Southwest has seen a steady stream of migration, both legal and illegal, from Latin America. These migrants are often willing to work in industries that are struggling to find labor in other parts of the country. By channeling this labor force into manufacturing, we can address both the need for jobs and the challenges of immigration.

The sheer size of the Southwest means that we can build big, and we can build smart. These new industrial hubs could be designed with the latest advancements in manufacturing technology, including automation, AI, and robotics. We can create the most advanced, efficient, and secure manufacturing facilities the world has ever seen—all while creating jobs and boosting the economy.

But to power this new wave of manufacturing, we need energy. And not just any energy—we need reliable, consistent, and clean energy. This is where nuclear power comes in.

Nuclear energy is often misunderstood. Thanks to a few high-profile accidents—most notably Chernobyl and Fukushima—many people see it as dangerous. But the reality is that nuclear technology has advanced significantly since those disasters. Modern reactors are far safer, more efficient, and produce less waste than their predecessors.

The story of nuclear power in the United States is one of missed opportunities. In the 1950s and 1960s, the U.S. was a global leader in nuclear technology. The promise of “Atoms for Peace” led to the construction of nuclear power plants across the country. These plants provided cheap, reliable electricity and were seen as the future of energy.

But by the 1970s, the tide had turned. The Three Mile Island accident in 1979, followed by the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, fueled public fears about nuclear safety. Environmental activists, driven by fear rather than facts, pushed for the closure of nuclear plants and the abandonment of new projects. The result was a decline in the U.S. nuclear industry, with few new plants being built and existing plants being shuttered.

Meanwhile, other countries were moving ahead. France, for example, has long been a leader in nuclear energy, with nearly 70% of its electricity coming from nuclear power. French nuclear technology is among the most advanced in the world, and their reactors are models of safety and efficiency. France understands that nuclear power isn’t just an energy source; it’s a strategic asset.

China, too, is surging ahead. The Chinese government has recognized the need for reliable, carbon-free energy and is rapidly expanding its nuclear capacity. China’s Hualong One reactors are setting new standards for efficiency and safety, and the country is on track to become the world’s largest producer of nuclear energy within the next decade.

Meanwhile, the United States, once the leader in this field, is stuck in the past. Political fearmongering, driven by environmental activists who ignore the facts, has stalled our nuclear ambitions. Instead of leading the world in this critical area, we’re falling behind. But it doesn’t have to be this way.

The American Southwest, with its vast, empty spaces, is the perfect location for a nuclear renaissance. We have the technology. We have the expertise. What we need is the political will to make it happen.

Modern nuclear technology, particularly small modular reactors (SMRs), offers the perfect solution. These reactors are smaller, cheaper, and faster to build than traditional nuclear plants. They can be deployed in remote locations, close to manufacturing hubs, reducing transmission losses and improving efficiency. SMRs represent the future of nuclear energy, and the Southwest is the ideal place to deploy them.

But there’s another layer to this conversation that we must address—one that goes beyond simply rebuilding our industrial base. It’s about the very foundation of the global financial system: the U.S. dollar. For decades, the dollar has served as the world’s reserve currency. This status has afforded the United States enormous economic benefits, including lower borrowing costs and the ability to run trade deficits with impunity. But this privilege is not guaranteed, and it is increasingly under threat.

The dollar’s role as the global reserve currency is closely tied to the productivity and stability of the U.S. economy. As other nations have grown and developed their own financial systems, the relative dominance of the U.S. has diminished. If we fail to rebuild our industrial base and continue to rely on debt-fueled consumption, we risk undermining the very foundation of the dollar’s strength.

To understand the importance of the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency, we need to revisit its history. In 1913, the Federal Reserve was created—a shadowy institution born out of secret meetings on Jekyll Island. This “Creature from Jekyll Island,” as it’s often called, was designed to stabilize the economy. But in reality, it handed control of our money supply to private banks, setting the stage for a century of boom-and-bust cycles.

The real turning point came in 1971 when President Nixon closed the gold window, ending the dollar’s direct convertibility into gold. This move severed the last ties between the dollar and tangible assets, transforming the dollar into a pure fiat currency backed only by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. Since then, the dollar has been subject to the whims of politicians and central bankers, leading to inflation, currency devaluation, and the erosion of the American middle class.

Today, the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency is under threat. Countries like China and Russia are actively seeking alternatives, and the rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin poses a direct challenge to the dollar’s dominance. If we don’t take action to strengthen our currency, we risk losing the economic advantages that have made America the world’s superpower.

Restoring our manufacturing sector is not just about jobs or national security—it’s about maintaining the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency. The connection here is clear: increased productivity leads to a stronger economy, which in turn supports a stronger dollar. By bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., we bolster our economic foundation, making the dollar more resilient against the challenges posed by rising global powers.

But rebuilding our industrial base isn’t just about increasing productivity. It’s also about cutting the fat from a bloated government that has become more of a hindrance than a help. We need to increase production, but we also need to decrease spending. The federal government is hemorrhaging money, much of it wasted on inefficient programs and bureaucratic overhead.

Where do we start? How about the Department of Education, a bloated bureaucracy that has done little to improve educational outcomes while siphoning billions of dollars from taxpayers? Or the endless stream of subsidies to industries that should be able to stand on their own two feet?

The military-industrial complex, while necessary for national defense, is another area ripe for reform. Do we really need to spend billions on weapons systems that even the Pentagon says it doesn’t want? It’s time to prioritize spending that actually enhances our security and economic stability.

By cutting unnecessary spending, we free up resources that can be redirected into areas that truly matter—like rebuilding our industrial base, investing in infrastructure, and securing our energy future.

But we can’t stop at just rebuilding our physical infrastructure. We must also embrace the financial innovations of the 21st century, particularly cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. In a world where digital currencies are gaining traction, the United States has an opportunity to lead—not just in traditional finance but in the new, digital economy.

Bitcoin, often dubbed “digital gold,” offers a decentralized, secure alternative to traditional fiat currencies. While some view it as a threat to the dollar, it can also be seen as an opportunity. By integrating Bitcoin into our financial system, we can strengthen the dollar, making it more adaptable and resilient in the face of global financial changes.

Imagine a scenario where the U.S. dollar is backed not just by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, but also by a reserve of Bitcoin. This would create a hybrid currency that combines the stability of the dollar with the decentralized security of Bitcoin. Such a move would not only bolster the dollar’s position as the world’s reserve currency but also ensure that the U.S. remains at the forefront of financial innovation.

By leading the charge in integrating Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies into the mainstream financial system, the United States can set the standard for the future of money. This isn’t just about staying relevant—it’s about maintaining our economic sovereignty in a rapidly changing world.

So, what does this all mean? It means that the United States has the opportunity to reclaim its position as the world’s manufacturing leader. By leveraging the untapped potential of the Southwest, we can build a new industrial base that’s stronger, more secure, and more advanced than anything we’ve had before.

This isn’t just about jobs—though it will create plenty of those. It’s about independence. It’s about ensuring that the next time a global crisis hits, we’re not left waiting on shipments from foreign countries. We’re not scrambling to secure critical supplies from nations that may not have our best interests at heart. We’re building what we need, right here at home, with our own resources and our own people.

It’s also about innovation. The combination of AI, advanced manufacturing techniques, nuclear power, and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin will place the United States at the forefront of the next industrial revolution. We’re talking about manufacturing that’s not just efficient, but smart—factories that can adapt on the fly, customize products at scale, and operate with a level of precision that was once unimaginable.

And let’s not forget the environmental benefits. By focusing on nuclear power, we’re reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, cutting greenhouse gas emissions, and taking a serious step toward addressing climate change. This isn’t just good for the economy—it’s good for the planet.

But this won’t happen on its own. It requires vision, leadership, and a commitment to investing in the future. The federal government needs to support this initiative with policies that encourage domestic manufacturing, invest in nuclear energy, and protect intellectual property. Private industry needs to step up, too, by committing to build the factories, the data centers, and the infrastructure that will power the next generation of American industry.

And the American people? We need to recognize what’s at stake. We need to understand that bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. isn’t just a nice idea—it’s essential to our future. It’s about more than just economics—it’s about survival. If we want to remain a superpower, if we want to maintain our way of life, we need to rebuild our industrial base. The Southwest gives us the land, AI gives us the tools, nuclear power gives us the energy, and cryptocurrencies give us a new form of economic strength.

This is our moment. The clock is ticking, and the future of American industry is at stake. Will we seize this opportunity, or will we continue to let our once-great industrial base decay? The choice is ours. But if we’re smart enough, if we’re bold enough, we can make it happen. And in doing so, we can usher in a new era of American prosperity—one that’s built not on the shifting sands of globalization, but on the solid foundation of American ingenuity, American resources, and American resolve.

The path is clear, the potential is enormous, and the future is waiting. The time to act is now.

Want to stay ahead of the curve?

Stay up to date with the latest trends, market insights, and opportunities in real estate. Visit PGR Group to learn more about how you can be a part of this evolving landscape. Connect with me on LinkedIn , Facebook , or Twitter to get real-time updates and insights. If you’re ready to dive deeper and receive exclusive information, subscribe for more. Don’t miss out on the future of real estate.

Interested in investing? Invest in our Fund be a part of something big.

Also, explore opportunities with EXP Commercial and see how we’re changing the game in the commercial real estate sector.